All About @lienphu@
17 / libra / 28 Sept 1987
epps > vs > tjc 20/04
tjco.percussion
allanphua@hotmail.com
d.i.s.c.l.a.i.m.e.r
quiet.introvert.observant.thinker.
perfectionist.hot-tempered?
watches the amazing race.
survivor.korean dramas.
LOST.desperate housewives.
mtv 封神榜.康熙来了.全民大闷锅
listens to chinese pop.rock music.mayday.fish leong
Let's play!
Places to Go
CNet Asia - Reviews
Download.com - Free Software
IMDb - Movies database
OneLook - Dictionary
tjc online
People to See
chen yu
daniel
hoi ching
hong zhou
maurice
rachel
wanyi
weiliang
ye xian
Archives
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
November 2005
August 2006
September 2006
Messages
|
powered by TagBoard Message Board |
Credits
blogskins
template by up_in_lights
picture by Digital Blasphemy game script by Lancer
Thursday, June 23, 2005
nice photo... this time there's even a photo collection CD... many shots of us performing... just like a photo album. view it here. i must order it. but quite expensive leh... $14 for A4 size.
the feeling of getting a gold this SYF is vastly different from the previous outing. we left SCH dejected this time, in contrast to SYF 2003 when we were jubilant. xuguang and daniel should know this very well.
somehow i think lion looks happier here:
do u think so? =)
this photo looks cute:
wonder what they were singing at that time...
~ the @lie[n] landed on Earth @ 1:21 AM
Wednesday, June 22, 2005
i was attending tuition today when my tutor asked us to complete a survey for him... initially we thought it was just about what we think about him, how he teach, the usual stuff. but after questioning further, he was just helping one of his year one students from a jc near where we were (east region of cos) do his/her PW survey... the immediate response from the class was "anyhow do lah", and jee shiang was saying how PW survey results can be faked easily, according to what you 'want'... haha.
so the survey was about playing in an arcade. i seldom step into an arcade... so actually i can't really give my best opinions about it. i can, or u can say, everyone can comment on the survey structure/format though. the survey just started with an 'objective'... without introducing who the surveyors are, what is it for (PW), and worse of all, didn't even thank me for doing the survey. i was laughing away while doing the survey as everyone was scrutinising it, to the extent of nitpicking, and they were openly criticising it. however, besides the above bad point, there were many others:
1. one of the questions required us to tick... but where are the boxes? okay, maybe we can tick anywhere but why were there brackets provided, like every other MCQ?
2. the last two questions were free response ones, so lines were provided for us to write... but alternate lines are incompletely drawn... example:
_______________________________________________________________
_
_______________________________________________________________
_
_______________________________________________________________
hello? can't even draw a proper line using microsoft word? ancient inventions like a pen and ruler can assist you too.
3. no questions were asked about me. i suppose age and gender are important to determine whether one goes to an arcade once a week, or 6 to 7 times a week, as indicated in one of the options.
4. one MJC girl was saying that she chose the option 'no' to a series of questions simply because she doesn't go to the arcade. u cannot blame her, since this survey didn't take into consideration of the people who dun visit an arcade at all.
5. grammar problems. aiyoh, i circled that error and wrote on top of it, "GP fail, ah?"
at the end of the survey, i wrote this in the suggestions section: "All the best to your PW with a survey like that. Yeah." at least i wrote this in pencil ok. my friend wrote his comments using a highlighter. really ah, this survey seems more like a draft to me. wonder wad the supervising tutor was thinking or doing when checking this survey. worse come to worse, he/she might have done nothing. =P
on another note, JCT is coming in less that one weeks time! argh... i have many more topics to go... bye!
so the survey was about playing in an arcade. i seldom step into an arcade... so actually i can't really give my best opinions about it. i can, or u can say, everyone can comment on the survey structure/format though. the survey just started with an 'objective'... without introducing who the surveyors are, what is it for (PW), and worse of all, didn't even thank me for doing the survey. i was laughing away while doing the survey as everyone was scrutinising it, to the extent of nitpicking, and they were openly criticising it. however, besides the above bad point, there were many others:
1. one of the questions required us to tick... but where are the boxes? okay, maybe we can tick anywhere but why were there brackets provided, like every other MCQ?
2. the last two questions were free response ones, so lines were provided for us to write... but alternate lines are incompletely drawn... example:
_______________________________________________________________
_
_______________________________________________________________
_
_______________________________________________________________
hello? can't even draw a proper line using microsoft word? ancient inventions like a pen and ruler can assist you too.
3. no questions were asked about me. i suppose age and gender are important to determine whether one goes to an arcade once a week, or 6 to 7 times a week, as indicated in one of the options.
4. one MJC girl was saying that she chose the option 'no' to a series of questions simply because she doesn't go to the arcade. u cannot blame her, since this survey didn't take into consideration of the people who dun visit an arcade at all.
5. grammar problems. aiyoh, i circled that error and wrote on top of it, "GP fail, ah?"
at the end of the survey, i wrote this in the suggestions section: "All the best to your PW with a survey like that. Yeah." at least i wrote this in pencil ok. my friend wrote his comments using a highlighter. really ah, this survey seems more like a draft to me. wonder wad the supervising tutor was thinking or doing when checking this survey. worse come to worse, he/she might have done nothing. =P
on another note, JCT is coming in less that one weeks time! argh... i have many more topics to go... bye!
~ the @lie[n] landed on Earth @ 1:16 AM
Tuesday, June 21, 2005
| You Were Actually Born Under: |
 You're very compassionate and protective of those you love, sometimes too protective. Your home is really your castle, and you make sure your home is comfortable and well furnished. You don't like to argue - and you prefer a quiet, peaceful life. You are most compatible with a Goat or a Pig. |
| You Should Have Been Born Under: |
 Resourceful and practical, you are a quick thinker. You are very observant - and it's hard to get anything past you! A total perfectionist, you are especially picky about looking your best. You're a big dreamer - such a big dreamer that reality can disappoint you. You are most compatible with an Ox or Snake. |
~ the @lie[n] landed on Earth @ 1:12 AM